California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.
379 U.S. 366 · Decided January 18, 1965 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. was decided on January 18, 1965 by a vote of 7–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Gas pipeline regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 379 U.S. 366 · 85 S. Ct. 486 · 13 L. Ed. 2d 357 · 1965 U.S. LEXIS 2229
- Docket number
- 46
- Decided
- January 18, 1965
- Argued
- November 17, 1964
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–1
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Gas pipeline regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Did not participate: Byron R. White.
Full case caption
California et al. v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1964-025, docket 1964-025-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Gas pipeline regulation”
- Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
- Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light
- Federal Power Commission v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.
- Federal Power Commission v. Hunt
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.
- Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Brulotte v. Thys Co.
- Gillespie v. United States Steel Corp.
- King v. United States
- City of El Paso v. Simmons
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. American Trailer Rentals Co.
- Davis v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error