Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc.
377 U.S. 33 · Decided April 20, 1964 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. was decided on April 20, 1964 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Venue” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 377 U.S. 33 · 84 S. Ct. 1105 · 12 L. Ed. 2d 112 · 1964 U.S. LEXIS 2166
- Docket number
- 386
- Decided
- April 20, 1964
- Argued
- March 25, 1964
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Venue
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Arthur J. Goldberg | Majority |
Full case caption
Federal Power Commission v. Texaco Inc. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1963-102, docket 1963-102-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Venue”
- Van Dusen, U.S. District Judge v. Barrack
- Platt v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.
- Parsons v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
- Michigan National Bank v. Robertson et Ux.
- Mercantile National Bank at Dallas v. Langdeau
- Southern Construction Co., Inc. v. Pickard
Cases on the same legal provision: Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Federal Power Commission v. Hunt
- California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.
- Wisconsin v. Federal Power Commission
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Continental Oil Co.
- Northern Natural Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission of Kansas
- Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Shenandoah Valley Broadcasting, Inc. v. American Society of Composers
- Parsons v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.
- Gotthilf v. Sills
- Dresner v. City of Tallahassee
- Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railroad Co. v. United States
- Aldrich v. Aldrich
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error