United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light
358 U.S. 103 · Decided December 8, 1958 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light was decided on December 8, 1958 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Gas pipeline regulation” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 358 U.S. 103 · 79 S. Ct. 194 · 3 L. Ed. 2d 153 · 1958 U.S. LEXIS 1773
- Docket number
- 23
- Decided
- December 8, 1958
- Argued
- October 20, 1958
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- John M. Harlan II
- Opinion assigned by
- Felix Frankfurter
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Gas pipeline regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Dissent | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Did not participate: Tom C. Clark.
Full case caption
United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1958-016, docket 1958-016-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Gas pipeline regulation”
- Federal Power Commission v. Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Corp.
- Federal Power Commission v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Co.
- California v. Lo-Vaca Gathering Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
- Federal Power Commission v. Interstate Natural Gas Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Natural Gas Act or Natural Gas Policy Act
- Atlantic Refining Co. v. Public Service Commission of New York
- Texas Gas Transmission Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.
- Sunray Mid-Continent Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Sun Oil Co. v. Federal Power Commission
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Superior Court of Delaware for New Castle County
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Moore v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis
- Sangamon Valley Television Corp. v. United States
- Wirl Television Corp. v. United States
- Deen v. Hickman
- Worz, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error