Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.
416 U.S. 663 · Decided May 15, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co. was decided on May 15, 1974 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice William J. Brennan Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Debtors' rights” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 416 U.S. 663 · 94 S. Ct. 2080 · 40 L. Ed. 2d 452 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 140
- Docket number
- 73-157
- Decided
- May 15, 1974
- Argued
- January 7, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- William J. Brennan Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Debtors' rights
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Concurrence | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Calero-Toledo et al. v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1973-105, docket 1973-105-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Debtors' rights”
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Altered precedent
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Fuentes v. ShevinLaw held unconstitutional
- Lynch v. Household Finance Corp.
- D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. v. Frick Co.
- Swarb v. Lennox
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Donnelly v. Dechristoforo
- Blackledge v. Perry
- Ross v. Moffitt
- Taylor v. Hayes
- Wolff v. McDonnell
- Smith v. GoguenLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- United States Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Hibi
- Dennett v. Hogan
- Department of Game of Washington v. Puyallup Tribe
- Kusper v. PontikesLaw held unconstitutional
- Espinoza et Vir v. Farah Manufacturing Co., Inc.
- O'Brien v. SkinnerLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error