CaseTrail

Norton Company v. Department of Revenue of Illinois

340 U.S. 534 · Decided February 26, 1951 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Norton Company v. Department of Revenue of Illinois was decided on February 26, 1951 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
340 U.S. 534 · 71 S. Ct. 377 · 95 L. Ed. 2d 517 · 1951 U.S. LEXIS 2157
Docket number
133
Decided
February 26, 1951
Argued
December 6, 1950
Court era
Vinson Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Robert H. Jackson
Opinion assigned by
Fred M. Vinson
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Hugo L. BlackDissent
Justice Stanley F. ReedDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Felix FrankfurterMajority
Justice William O. DouglasDissent
Justice Robert H. JacksonMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Harold H. BurtonMajority
Chief Justice Fred M. VinsonMajority
Justice Tom C. ClarkDissentWrote an opinion
Justice Sherman MintonMajority

Full case caption

Norton Company v. Department of Revenue of Illinois

SCDB identifiers: case 1950-044, docket 1950-044-01.

Other cases on “State or local government tax”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error