Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John Ivan Sutter
569 U.S. 564 · Decided June 10, 2013 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Oxford Health Plans LLC v. John Ivan Sutter was decided on June 10, 2013 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Elena Kagan wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Arbitration (non-labor)” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 569 U.S. 564 · 133 S. Ct. 2064 · 186 L. Ed. 2d 113 · 2013 U.S. LEXIS 4358
- Docket number
- 12-135
- Decided
- June 10, 2013
- Argued
- March 25, 2013
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Elena Kagan
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Arbitration (non-labor)
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- 9-1
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Oxford Health Plans LLC, Petitioner v. John Ivan Sutter
SCDB identifiers: case 2012-055, docket 2012-055-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Arbitration (non-labor)”
- American Express Company v. Italian Colors Restaurant
- Bg Group PLC v. Republic of Argentina
- Marmet Health Care Center, Inc. v. Clayton Brown
- Compucredit Corporation v. Wanda Greenwood
- KPMG LLP v. Robert Cocchi
- AT&T Mobility LLC v. Vincent Concepcion
Cases on the same legal provision: 9-1
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District Petitioner v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
- Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Phoebe Putney Health System, Inc.
- Olivea Marx v. General Revenue Corporation
- Marc J. Gabelli and Bruce Alpert v. Securities and Exchange Commission
- Amgen Inc. v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error