CaseTrail

Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Eddie Lee Howard

568 U.S. 17 · Decided November 26, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Eddie Lee Howard was decided on November 26, 2012 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Arbitration in labor-management disputes” in the Unions area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
568 U.S. 17 · 133 S. Ct. 500 · 184 L. Ed. 2d 328 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 8897
Docket number
11-1377
Decided
November 26, 2012
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Unions
Legal provision
Federal Arbitration Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Nitro-Lift Technologies, L.L.C. v. Eddie Lee Howard et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2012-003, docket 2012-003-01.

Other cases on “Arbitration in labor-management disputes”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Arbitration Act

Same Term, same area (Unions)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error