Arkansas v. Oklahoma
503 U.S. 91 · Decided February 26, 1992 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Arkansas v. Oklahoma was decided on February 26, 1992 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 503 U.S. 91 · 112 S. Ct. 1046 · 117 L. Ed. 2d 239 · 1992 U.S. LEXIS 1373
- Docket number
- 90-1262
- Decided
- February 26, 1992
- Argued
- December 11, 1991
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority |
Full case caption
Arkansas, et al. v. Oklahoma, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1991-037, docket 1991-037-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- F. Dale Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society
- Mary Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Association
- General Motors Corporation v. United States
- City of Chicago v. Environmental Defense Fund
- Pud No. 1 of Jefferson County and City of Tacoma v. Washington Department of Ecology
- Key Tronic Corporation v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- United States Department of Energy v. Ohio
- City of Burlington v. Ernest Dague, Sr.
- International Paper Co. v. Ouellette
- Friends of the Earth v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (Toc), Inc.
- United States v. Ward
- Environmental Protection Agency v. California ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Board
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Southwest Marine, Inc. v. Byron Gizoni
- Union Bank v. Herbert Wolas
- Kenneth Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commission
- Hunter v. Bryant
- Shirley M. Molzof v. United States
- Aletha Dewsnup v. Louis L. Timm
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error