CaseTrail

F. Dale Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society

503 U.S. 429 · Decided March 25, 1992 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

F. Dale Robertson v. Seattle Audubon Society was decided on March 25, 1992 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
503 U.S. 429 · 112 S. Ct. 1407 · 118 L. Ed. 2d 73 · 1992 U.S. LEXIS 1951
Docket number
90-1596
Decided
March 25, 1992
Argued
December 2, 1991
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Article III, Section 1, Paragraph 1 (judicial power)
Type of law
Constitution
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

F. Dale Robertson, Chief, United States Forest Service, Et. al. v. Seattle Audubon Society et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1991-055, docket 1991-055-01.

Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 1, Paragraph 1 (judicial power)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error