Environmental Protection Agency v. California ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Board
426 U.S. 200 · Decided June 7, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Environmental Protection Agency v. California ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Board was decided on June 7, 1976 by a vote of 7–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “National supremacy, air or water pollution” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 426 U.S. 200 · 96 S. Ct. 2022 · 48 L. Ed. 2d 578 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 105
- Docket number
- 74-1435
- Decided
- June 7, 1976
- Argued
- January 13, 1976
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- National supremacy, air or water pollution
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Co-authored an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Environmental Protection Agency et al. v. California ex Rel. State Water Resources Control Board et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-112, docket 1975-112-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “National supremacy, air or water pollution”
- Hancock v. Train
- Pennsylvania v. Union Gas Co.
- New York v. United StatesLaw held unconstitutional
- Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit
Cases on the same legal provision: Clean Water Act (Federal Water Pollution Control Act)
- Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train
- Train v. City of New York
- Train v. Campaign Clean Water, Inc.
- Crown Simpson Pulp Co. v. Costle
- Costle v. Pacific Legal Foundation
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- United States v. Maine
- United States v. Florida
- Hancock v. Train
- Lodge 76 v. Wisconsin Employment Relations CommissionAltered precedent
- Utah v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error