Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
436 U.S. 547 · Decided May 31, 1978 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Zurcher v. Stanford Daily was decided on May 31, 1978 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 436 U.S. 547 · 98 S. Ct. 1970 · 56 L. Ed. 2d 525 · 1978 U.S. LEXIS 98
- Docket number
- 76-1484
- Decided
- May 31, 1978
- Argued
- January 17, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourth Amendment
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: William J. Brennan Jr..
Full case caption
Zurcher, Chief of Police of Palo Alto, et al. v. Stanford Daily et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-098, docket 1977-098-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- Michigan v. Tyler
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Mincey v. Arizona
- Franks v. Delaware
- United States v. Ceccolini
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourth Amendment
- Pennsylvania v. Mimms
- Rakas v. Illinois
- Delaware v. Prouse
- Dalia v. United States
- United States v. Chadwick
- Dunaway v. New York
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Rinaldi v. United States
- Pennsylvania v. Mimms
- United States v. New York Telephone Co.
- Moore v. Illinois
- Smith v. Digmon
- Bordenkircher v. Hayes
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error