United States v. New York Telephone Co.
434 U.S. 159 · Decided December 7, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. New York Telephone Co. was decided on December 7, 1977 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 434 U.S. 159 · 98 S. Ct. 364 · 54 L. Ed. 2d 376 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 161
- Docket number
- 76-835
- Decided
- December 7, 1977
- Argued
- October 3, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal crime control and firearms statutes
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
United States v. New York Telephone Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1977-016, docket 1977-016-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- United States v. Ceccolini
- Marshall v. Barlow's, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Michigan v. Tyler
- Zurcher v. Stanford Daily
- United States v. Ramsey
- Mincey v. Arizona
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal crime control and firearms statutes
- Scott v. United States
- Scarborough v. United States
- United States v. Donovan
- Dunn v. United States
- United States v. Batchelder
- Barrett v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Rinaldi v. United States
- Pennsylvania v. Mimms
- Moore v. Illinois
- Smith v. Digmon
- Bordenkircher v. Hayes
- Arizona v. Washington
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error