Zf Automotive Us v. Luxshare, Ltd.
142 S. Ct. 2078 · Decided June 13, 2022 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Zf Automotive Us v. Luxshare, Ltd. was decided on June 13, 2022 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Arbitration (non-labor)” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2021
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 21-401
Case details
- Citations
- 142 S. Ct. 2078 · 213 L. Ed. 2d 163 · 2022 U.S. LEXIS 2861
- Docket number
- 21-401
- Decided
- June 13, 2022
- Argued
- March 23, 2022
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Amy Coney Barrett
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Arbitration (non-labor)
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- 28 USC 1782
- Type of law
- Infrequently litigated statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Zf Automotive Us v. Luxshare, Ltd.
SCDB identifiers: case 2021-059, docket 2021-059-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Arbitration (non-labor)”
- Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski
- Coinbase v. Suski
- Ge Energy Power Conversion France Sas v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC
- Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.
- Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
- Flower Foods v. Brock
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor
- Biden v. Missouri
- Hughes v. Northwestern University
- Unicolors, Inc v. H&m Hennes & Mauritz, Lp
- Gallardo v. Marstiller
- Siegel v. FitzgeraldLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error