Flower Foods v. Brock
146 S. Ct. 1358 · Decided May 28, 2026 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Flower Foods v. Brock was decided on May 28, 2026 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Neil M. Gorsuch wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Arbitration (non-labor)” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2025
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 24-935
Case details
- Citations
- 146 S. Ct. 1358 · 225 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 2026 U.S. LEXIS 2297
- Docket number
- 24-935
- Decided
- May 28, 2026
- Argued
- March 25, 2026
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Neil M. Gorsuch
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Arbitration (non-labor)
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Arbitration Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority | |
| Justice Amy Coney Barrett | Majority | |
| Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson | Majority |
Full case caption
Flower Foods v. Brock
SCDB identifiers: case 2025-050, docket 2025-050-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Arbitration (non-labor)”
- Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
- Coinbase v. Suski
- Coinbase, Inc. v. Bielski
- Zf Automotive Us v. Luxshare, Ltd.
- Ge Energy Power Conversion France Sas v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC
- Henry Schein Inc. v. Archer and White Sales Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Arbitration Act
- Smith v. Spizzirri
- Bissonnette v. Lepage Bakeries Park St., LLC
- Viking River Cruises v. Moriana
- Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon
- Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.
- Badgerow v. Walters
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Coney Island Auto Parts Unlimited, Inc. v. Burton
- U.S. Postal Service v. Konan
- Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation
- Cox Communications v. Sony Music Entm't
- Hencely v. Fluor Corporation
- Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error