Bartnicki v. Vopper
532 U.S. 514 · Decided May 21, 2001 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Bartnicki v. Vopper was decided on May 21, 2001 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Libel and privacy (false light)” in the First Amendment area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 532 U.S. 514 · 121 S. Ct. 1753 · 149 L. Ed. 2d 787 · 2001 U.S. LEXIS 3815
- Docket number
- 99-1687
- Decided
- May 21, 2001
- Argued
- December 5, 2000
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- John Paul Stevens
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Libel and privacy (false light)
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Concurrence | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Dissent | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Bartnicki et al. v. Vopper, aka Williams, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2000-052, docket 2000-052-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Libel and privacy (false light)”
- The Florida Star v. B. J. F.Law held unconstitutional
- Nixon v. Administrator of General Services
- Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.
- Cox Broadcasting Corp. v. CohnLaw held unconstitutional
- Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.
- Time, Inc. v. Hill
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Good News Club v. Milford Central School
- Robert Shaw v. Kevin Murphy
- Legal Services Corporation v. Carmen VelazquezLaw held unconstitutional
- Caren Cronk Thomas and Windy City Hemp Development Board v. Chicago Park District
- Boy Scouts of America and Monmouth Council v. James DaleLaw held unconstitutional
- Leila Jeanne Hill v. Colorado
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Legal Services Corporation v. Carmen VelazquezLaw held unconstitutional
- Robert Shaw v. Kevin Murphy
- Good News Club v. Milford Central School
- United States and Department of Agriculture v. United Foods, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Federal Election Commission v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error