CaseTrail

William J. Clinton v. James T. Goldsmith

526 U.S. 529 · Decided May 17, 1999 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

William J. Clinton v. James T. Goldsmith was decided on May 17, 1999 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice David H. Souter wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals” in the Judicial Power area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
526 U.S. 529 · 119 S. Ct. 1538 · 143 L. Ed. 2d 720 · 1999 U.S. LEXIS 3173
Docket number
98-347
Decided
May 17, 1999
Argued
March 22, 1999
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
David H. Souter
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Judicial Power
Legal provision
28 U.S.C. § 1651
Type of law
Infrequently litigated statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

William J. Clinton, President of the United States, et al. v. James T. Goldsmith

SCDB identifiers: case 1998-053, docket 1998-053-01.

Other cases on “Jurisdiction of federal courts of appeals”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: 28 U.S.C. § 1651

Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error