Vladimir Zatko v. California
502 U.S. 16 · Decided November 4, 1991 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Vladimir Zatko v. California was decided on November 4, 1991 unanimously (8–0). SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 502 U.S. 16 · 112 S. Ct. 355 · 116 L. Ed. 2d 293 · 1991 U.S. LEXIS 6501
- Docket number
- 91-5052
- Decided
- November 4, 1991
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Docketing fee
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Supreme Court Rules
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority |
Did not participate: Clarence Thomas.
Full case caption
Vladimir Zatko v. California
SCDB identifiers: case 1991-003, docket 1991-003-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee”
- In re John Robert Demos, Jr.
- James L. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
- In re Grant Anderson
- In re Fred Whitaker
- Fred A. Whitaker v. Superior Court of California
- Robert Attwood v. Harry K. Singletary, Jr.
Cases on the same legal provision: Supreme Court Rules
- In re Michael Sindram
- John Robert Demos, Jr. v. Michael C. Storrie
- Roy A. Day v. Donald P. Day
- In re George Sassower
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corporation
- Wrenn v. Benson
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Raymond Mireles v. Howard Waco
- Barbara Hafer v. James C. Melo, Jr.
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. National Center for Immigrants' Rights, Inc.
- William 'sky' King v. St. Vincent's Hospital
- County of Yakima v. Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation
- Barbara J. Norman v. Dorothy ReedLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error