In re Fred Whitaker
513 U.S. 1 · Decided October 11, 1994 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
In re Fred Whitaker was decided on October 11, 1994 by a vote of 8–1. SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 513 U.S. 1 · 115 S. Ct. 2 · 130 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1994 U.S. LEXIS 7040
- Docket number
- 93-9220
- Decided
- October 11, 1994
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Mandamus
- Issue (SCDB)
- Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Supreme Court Rules
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Majority | |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority |
Full case caption
In re Fred Whitaker
SCDB identifiers: case 1994-001, docket 1994-001-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Indigents, Supreme Court docketing fee”
- In re Grant Anderson
- Fred A. Whitaker v. Superior Court of California
- Robert Attwood v. Harry K. Singletary, Jr.
- Sylvester Jones v. Abc-Tv
- Liang-Houh Shieh v. Edward Kakita
- James L. Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Cases on the same legal provision: Supreme Court Rules
- Izumi Seimitsu Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v. U. S. Philips Corporation
- Roy A. Day v. Donald P. Day
- In re George Sassower
- John Robert Demos, Jr. v. Michael C. Storrie
- In re Maria Luisa Costell Gaydos
- In re Michael Sindram
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Anthony S. Austin v. United States
- Jesse Brown v. Fred P. Gardner
- Christine McKennon v. Nashville Banner Publishing Company
- Eloise Anderson v. Verna Edwards, Etc.
- Fred A. Whitaker v. Superior Court of California
- Marvin Stone v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error