Rogers v. United States
422 U.S. 35 · Decided June 17, 1975 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Rogers v. United States was decided on June 17, 1975 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Subconstitutional fair procedure, evidence presentation or sufficiency” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 422 U.S. 35 · 95 S. Ct. 2091 · 45 L. Ed. 2d 1 · 1975 U.S. LEXIS 77
- Docket number
- 73-6336
- Decided
- June 17, 1975
- Argued
- April 14, 1975
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Concurrence | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
Rogers v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1974-122, docket 1974-122-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Subconstitutional fair procedure, evidence presentation or sufficiency”
- Ring v. United States
- Demarco v. United States
- Moore v. United States
- Haines v. Kerner
- Cuyler v. Adams
- Boag v. Macdougall
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure
- United States v. Wilson
- Taylor v. United States
- Davis v. United States
- Douglas Oil Company of California v. Petrol Stops Northwest
- United States v. Timmreck
- Halliday v. United States
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Ring v. United States
- Francisco v. Gathright
- Maness v. Meyers
- Test v. United States
- Daniel v. Louisiana
- Gerstein v. Pugh
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error