United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
464 U.S. 165 · Decided January 10, 1984 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co. was decided on January 10, 1984 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Collateral estoppel or res judicata” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 464 U.S. 165 · 104 S. Ct. 575 · 78 L. Ed. 2d 388 · 1984 U.S. LEXIS 1
- Docket number
- 82-1448
- Decided
- January 10, 1984
- Argued
- November 2, 1983
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Collateral estoppel or res judicata
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Estoppel
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1983-013, docket 1983-013-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Collateral estoppel or res judicata”
- United States v. Mendoza
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Moitie
- Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. Shore
- Semtek International Incorporated v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
- Ford v. Ford
- Keith Lance v. Gigi Dennis
Cases on the same legal provision: Estoppel
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Miranda
- Schweiker v. Hansen
- Kadrmas v. Dickinson Public Schools
- Montana v. United States
- One Lot Emerald Cut Stones and One Ring v. United States
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Iron Arrow Honor Society v. Heckler
- United States v. Mendoza
- Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
- Flanagan v. United States
- Colorado v. Nunez
- South Carolina v. Regan
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error