Montana v. United States
440 U.S. 147 · Decided February 22, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Montana v. United States was decided on February 22, 1979 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local government tax” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 440 U.S. 147 · 99 S. Ct. 970 · 59 L. Ed. 2d 210 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 27
- Docket number
- 77-1134
- Decided
- February 22, 1979
- Argued
- December 4, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local government tax
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Estoppel
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Montana et al. v. United States
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-042, docket 1978-042-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local government tax”
- Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Finance Administration of City of New York
- Arizona Public Service Co. v. SneadLaw held unconstitutional
- Japan Line, Ltd. v. County of Los AngelesLaw held unconstitutional
- First Federal Savings & Loan Association of Boston v. Tax Commission of Massachusetts
- Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Bair
- Department of Revenue of Washington v. Association of Washington Stevedoring CompaniesAltered precedent
Cases on the same legal provision: Estoppel
- Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. v. Shore
- Schweiker v. Hansen
- Immigration and Naturalization Service v. Miranda
- United States v. Mendoza
- United States v. Stauffer Chemical Co.
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System v. First Lincolnwood Corp.
- Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Pennzoil Producing Co.
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Daniel
- Director v. Rasmussen
- Butner v. United States
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error