United States v. Morton Salt Co.
338 U.S. 632 · Decided February 6, 1950 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Morton Salt Co. was decided on February 6, 1950 unanimously (7–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Robert H. Jackson wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Judicial review of agency actions” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 338 U.S. 632 · 70 S. Ct. 357 · 94 L. Ed. 2d 401 · 1950 U.S. LEXIS 2600
- Docket number
- 273
- Decided
- February 6, 1950
- Argued
- December 14, 1949
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Robert H. Jackson
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Judicial review of agency actions
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority |
Did not participate: William O. Douglas, Sherman Minton.
Full case caption
United States v. Morton Salt Co.
SCDB identifiers: case 1949-040, docket 1949-040-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Judicial review of agency actions”
- Secretary of Agriculture v. Central Roig Refining Co.
- Chapman v. Sheridan-Wyoming Coal Co., Inc.
- United States v. Moorman
- United States v. United States Smelting Refining & Mining Co.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Mexia Textile Mills, Inc.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Pool Manufacturing Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Administrative Procedure Act or Administrative Orders Review Act
- Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath
- Ramspeck v. Federal Trial Examiners Conference
- Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro
- Boston & Maine Railroad v. United States
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe
- Sierra Club v. Morton
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Roth v. Delano
- Graham v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen
- Boyd v. Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company
- Parker v. County of Los Angeles
- Hubsch v. United States
- United States v. Moorman
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error