United States v. Grinnell Corp.
384 U.S. 563 · Decided June 13, 1966 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Grinnell Corp. was decided on June 13, 1966 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice William O. Douglas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 384 U.S. 563 · 86 S. Ct. 1698 · 16 L. Ed. 2d 778 · 1966 U.S. LEXIS 2988
- Docket number
- 73
- Decided
- June 13, 1966
- Argued
- March 28, 1966
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- William O. Douglas
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
United States v. Grinnell Corp. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1965-124, docket 1965-124-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Federal Trade Commission v. Brown Shoe Co., Inc.
- United States v. General Motors Corp.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Borden Co.
- Carnation Co. v. Pacific Westbound Conference
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- United Mine Workers of America v. Pennington
- Local Union No. 189 v. Jewel Tea Co., Inc.
- United States v. First National Bank & Trust Co. of Lexington
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- Los Angeles Meat & Provision Drivers Union v. United States
- International Boxing Club of New York, Inc. v. United States
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Gondeck v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.
- Leh v. General Petroleum Corp.
- Seaboard Air Line Railroad Co. v. United States
- United States v. Maryland for the Use of Meyer
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food Machinery & Chemical Corp.
- United Gas Improvement Co. v. Callery Properties, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error