United States v. Connecticut National Bank
418 U.S. 656 · Decided June 26, 1974 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
United States v. Connecticut National Bank was decided on June 26, 1974 by a vote of 5–4. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Mergers” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 418 U.S. 656 · 94 S. Ct. 2788 · 41 L. Ed. 2d 1016 · 1974 U.S. LEXIS 27
- Docket number
- 73-767
- Decided
- June 26, 1974
- Argued
- April 23, 1974
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Lewis F. Powell Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Mergers
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority |
Full case caption
United States v. Connecticut National Bank et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1973-170, docket 1973-170-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Mergers”
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.
- United States v. Citizens & Southern National Bank
- United States v. American Building Maintenance Industries
- United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of California
- California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking Unlimited
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
- Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Merrill Lynch v. Ware
- North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.Altered precedent
- National Railroad Passenger Corp. v. National Association of Railroad Passengers
- Sea-Land Services, Inc. v. Gaudet
- Federal Power Commission v. New England Power Co.
- Teleprompter Corp. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error