Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois
431 U.S. 720 · Decided June 9, 1977 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Illinois Brick Co. v. Illinois was decided on June 9, 1977 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Byron R. White wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 431 U.S. 720 · 97 S. Ct. 2061 · 52 L. Ed. 2d 707 · 1977 U.S. LEXIS 105
- Docket number
- 76-404
- Decided
- June 9, 1977
- Argued
- March 23, 1977
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Byron R. White
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Illinois Brick Co. et al. v. Illinois et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1976-127, docket 1976-127-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Continental T.V., Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Altered precedent
- Vendo Co. v. Lektro-Vend Corp.
- United States Steel Corp. v. Fortner Enterprises, Inc.
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
- Pfizer Inc. v. Government of India
- City of Lafayette v. Louisiana Power & Light Co.
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- United States v. American Building Maintenance Industries
- United States v. ITT Continental Baking Co.
- United States v. Marine Bancorporation, Inc.
- United States v. Connecticut National Bank
- United States v. General Dynamics Corp.
- United States v. Falstaff Brewing Corp.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Boston Stock Exchange v. State Tax CommissionLaw held unconstitutional
- Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
- United States Steel Corp. v. Fortner Enterprises, Inc.
- Piper v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train
- City of Philadelphia v. New Jersey
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error