CaseTrail

United States v. Alvin J. Dixon and Michael Foster

509 U.S. 688 · Decided June 28, 1993 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

United States v. Alvin J. Dixon and Michael Foster was decided on June 28, 1993 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision in part, reversed or vacated it in part, and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Double jeopardy” in the Criminal Procedure area. SCDB codes this decision as formally altering one or more of the Court's own precedents.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
509 U.S. 688 · 113 S. Ct. 2849 · 125 L. Ed. 2d 556 · 1993 U.S. LEXIS 4405
Docket number
91-1231
Decided
June 28, 1993
Argued
December 2, 1992
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Antonin Scalia
Opinion assigned by
Byron R. White
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Double jeopardy
Legal provision
Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Altered precedent
Yes — formally altered the Court's precedent
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

JusticeVoteSeparate writing
Justice Byron R. WhiteConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Harry A. BlackmunDissentWrote an opinion
Chief Justice William H. RehnquistDissentWrote an opinion
Justice John Paul StevensConcurrence
Justice Sandra Day O'ConnorDissent
Justice Antonin ScaliaMajorityWrote an opinion
Justice Anthony M. KennedyMajority
Justice David H. SouterConcurrenceWrote an opinion
Justice Clarence ThomasDissent

Full case caption

United States v. Alvin J. Dixon and Michael Foster

SCDB identifiers: case 1992-117, docket 1992-117-01.

Other cases on “Double jeopardy”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Fifth Amendment (double jeopardy)

Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error