Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency
427 U.S. 246 · Decided June 25, 1976 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency was decided on June 25, 1976 unanimously (9–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Natural resources and environmental protection” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 427 U.S. 246 · 96 S. Ct. 2518 · 49 L. Ed. 2d 474 · 1976 U.S. LEXIS 108
- Docket number
- 74-1542
- Decided
- June 25, 1976
- Argued
- January 21, 1976
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 9–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Thurgood Marshall
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Natural resources and environmental protection
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clean Air Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Concurrence | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority |
Full case caption
Union Electric Co. v. Environmental Protection Agency et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1975-153, docket 1975-153-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Natural resources and environmental protection”
- Flint Ridge Development Co. v. Scenic Rivers Association of Oklahoma
- Kleppe v. Sierra Club
- Kleppe v. New Mexico
- Cappaert v. United States
- Train v. Colorado Public Interest Research Group, Inc.
- E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Train
Cases on the same legal provision: Clean Air Act
- Hancock v. Train
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra Club
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air
- Engine Manufacturers Association and Western States Petroleum Association v. South Coast Air Quality Management District
- West Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Day & Zimmermann, Inc. v. Challoner
- Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc. v. Brada Miller Freight Systems, Inc.
- American Foreign Steamship Co. v. Matise
- Foremost-McKesson, Inc. v. Provident Securities Co.
- Michelin Tire Corp. v. WagesAltered precedent
- United States v. Bornstein
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error