Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.
370 U.S. 19 · Decided May 28, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. was decided on May 28, 1962 unanimously (7–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 370 U.S. 19 · 82 S. Ct. 1130 · 8 L. Ed. 2d 305 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 2299
- Docket number
- 241
- Decided
- May 28, 1962
- Argued
- March 21, 1962
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Clayton Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority |
Did not participate: Felix Frankfurter, Byron R. White.
Full case caption
Sunkist Growers, Inc., et al. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1961-083, docket 1961-083-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- United States v. Wise
- United States v. Borden Company
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
- United States v. Loew's Incorporated
Cases on the same legal provision: Clayton Act
- United States v. E. I. Du Pont de Nemours & Co.
- United States v. Philadelphia National Bank
- United States v. El Paso Natural Gas Co.
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of America
- United States v. Penn-Olin Chemical Co.
- United States v. Continental Can Co.
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Roper v. United States
- Martin v. Walton
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co., Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
- United States v. Drum
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error