Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.
368 U.S. 464 · Decided February 19, 1962 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc. was decided on February 19, 1962 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Tom C. Clark wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Antitrust” in the Economic Activity area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 368 U.S. 464 · 82 S. Ct. 486 · 7 L. Ed. 2d 458 · 1962 U.S. LEXIS 2315
- Docket number
- 45
- Decided
- February 19, 1962
- Argued
- November 13, 1961
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Tom C. Clark
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Antitrust
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Charles E. Whittaker | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent |
Full case caption
Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1961-033, docket 1961-033-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Antitrust”
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.
- United States v. Wise
- United States v. Borden Company
- Continental Ore Co. v. Union Carbide & Carbon Corp.
- United States v. Loew's Incorporated
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- United States v. Diebold
- Link v. Wabash Railroad Co.
- Conner v. Simler
- Foman v. Davis
- Harris Truck Lines, Inc. v. Cherry Meat Packers, Inc.
- United States v. Lucchese
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Roper v. United States
- Martin v. Walton
- Still v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. J-T Transport Co., Inc.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Henry Broch & Co.
- United States v. Drum
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error