CaseTrail

Steven Lefemine v. Dan Wideman

568 U.S. 1 · Decided November 5, 2012 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Steven Lefemine v. Dan Wideman was decided on November 5, 2012 unanimously (9–0). The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
568 U.S. 1 · 133 S. Ct. 9 · 184 L. Ed. 2d 313 · 2012 U.S. LEXIS 8566
Docket number
12-168
Decided
November 5, 2012
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Per curiam (no oral argument)
Disposition
Vacated and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
Civil Rights Attorney's Fees Awards Act
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Steven Lefemine, Dba Columbia Christians for Life v. Dan Wideman et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 2012-002, docket 2012-002-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error