CaseTrail

Bridget Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

560 U.S. 242 · Decided May 24, 2010 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Bridget Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company was decided on May 24, 2010 unanimously (9–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Clarence Thomas wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses” in the Attorneys area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
560 U.S. 242 · 130 S. Ct. 2149 · 176 L. Ed. 2d 998 · 2010 U.S. LEXIS 4164
Docket number
09-448
Decided
May 24, 2010
Argued
April 26, 2010
Court era
Roberts Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
9–0 (unanimous)
Majority opinion
Clarence Thomas
Opinion assigned by
John G. Roberts Jr.
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue area
Attorneys
Legal provision
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Liberal what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Bridget Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company

SCDB identifiers: case 2009-055, docket 2009-055-01.

Other cases on “Attorneys' and officials' fees, compensation, or licenses”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

Same Term, same area (Attorneys)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error