Snyder v. Harris
394 U.S. 332 · Decided March 25, 1969 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Snyder v. Harris was decided on March 25, 1969 by a vote of 7–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Hugo L. Black wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal rules of civil procedure” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 394 U.S. 332 · 89 S. Ct. 1053 · 22 L. Ed. 2d 319 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2155
- Docket number
- 109
- Decided
- March 25, 1969
- Argued
- January 21, 1969
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 7–2
- Majority opinion
- Hugo L. Black
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Federal rules of civil procedure
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- Type of law
- Court rules
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority |
Full case caption
Snyder v. Harris et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-064, docket 1968-064-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal rules of civil procedure”
- Shapiro v. Doe
- United States v. Cotton
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. Patterson
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. v. Gridiron Steel Co.
- Hanna v. Plumer
Cases on the same legal provision: Federal Rules of Civil or Appellate Procedure
- First National Bank of Arizona v. Cities Service Co.
- United States v. Reynolds et Ux.
- Lee v. WashingtonLaw held unconstitutional
- International Longshoremen's Association v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Association
- Carter v. Stanton
- United States v. First National City Bank
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Federal Power Commission v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.
- Mengelkoch v. Industrial Welfare Commission
- Universal Interpretive Shuttle Corp. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Commission
- Palmieri v. Florida
- Glover v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.
- Gorun v. Fall
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error