Skinner v. Louisiana
393 U.S. 473 · Decided January 27, 1969 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Skinner v. Louisiana was decided on January 27, 1969 by a vote of 6–3. SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Right to counsel” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 393 U.S. 473 · 89 S. Ct. 704 · 21 L. Ed. 2d 684 · 1969 U.S. LEXIS 2703
- Docket number
- 44
- Decided
- January 27, 1969
- Argued
- December 10, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Right to counsel
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Writ improvidently granted
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Skinner et al. v. Louisiana
SCDB identifiers: case 1968-041, docket 1968-041-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Right to counsel”
- Burgett v. Texas
- Mempa v. Rhay
- Wood v. United States
- Coleman v. Alabama
- Greer v. Beto
- United States v. Tucker
Cases on the same legal provision: Writ improvidently granted
- Palmieri v. Florida
- Perez v. California.
- Wainwright v. City of New Orleans
- Miller v. California
- Hanner v. Demarcus et Ux.
- Johnson v. Massachusetts
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- McConnell v. Rhay
- Arsenault v. Massachusetts
- International Terminal Operating Co., Inc. v. Nv Nederl. Amerik Stoomv Maats
- Fuller v. Alaska
- Smith v. Yeager
- Recznik v. City of Lorain
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error