Miller v. California
392 U.S. 616 · Decided June 17, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Miller v. California was decided on June 17, 1968 by a vote of 5–4. SCDB codes the disposition as “petition denied or appeal dismissed.” The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Search and seizure (general)” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 392 U.S. 616 · 88 S. Ct. 2258 · 20 L. Ed. 2d 1332 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 1143
- Docket number
- 154
- Decided
- June 17, 1968
- Argued
- March 26, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Petition denied or appeal dismissed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Opinion assigned by
- Hugo L. Black
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Search and seizure (general)
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Writ improvidently granted
- Type of law
- Other
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Dissent | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Full case caption
Miller v. California
SCDB identifiers: case 1967-190, docket 1967-190-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Search and seizure (general)”
- Mancusi v. Deforte
- Lee v. FloridaAltered precedent
- Wainwright v. City of New Orleans
- Terry v. Ohio
- Sibron v. New York
- Sabbath v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Writ improvidently granted
- Hanner v. Demarcus et Ux.
- Johnson v. Massachusetts
- Palmieri v. Florida
- Whitney v. Florida
- Umans v. United States
- Skinner v. Louisiana
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Bitter v. United States
- Roberts v. United States
- Wood v. United States
- Pinto v. Pierce
- Beecher v. Alabama
- Garner v. Yeager
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error