Shawn Patrick Lynch v. Arizona
578 U.S. 613 · Decided May 31, 2016 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Shawn Patrick Lynch v. Arizona was decided on May 31, 2016 by a vote of 6–2. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. The decision was issued per curiam (an unsigned opinion of the Court). SCDB classifies its main issue as “Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty” in the Criminal Procedure area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 578 U.S. 613 · 136 S. Ct. 1818 · 195 L. Ed. 2d 99 · 2016 U.S. LEXIS 3487
- Docket number
- 15-8366
- Decided
- May 31, 2016
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Per curiam (no oral argument)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty
- Issue area
- Criminal Procedure
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority |
Full case caption
Shawn Patrick Lynch v. Arizona
SCDB identifiers: case 2015-077, docket 2015-077-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Cruel and unusual punishment, death penalty”
- Kansas v. Carr
- Randy White v. Roger L. Wheeler
- Moore v. TexasLaw held unconstitutional
- Glossip v. Gross
- Hall v. FloridaLaw held unconstitutional
- Moore v. Texas
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Williams v. Pennsylvania
- Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtLaw held unconstitutional
- Wearry v. Cain
- Michael Damon Rippo v. Renee Baker
- Nelson v. ColoradoLaw held unconstitutional
- Obergefell v. HodgesAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Criminal Procedure)
- Maryland v. James Kulbicki
- Chadrin Lee Mullenix v. Beatrice Luna
- Randy White v. Roger L. Wheeler
- Hurst v. FloridaAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
- Kansas v. Carr
- Montgomery v. Louisiana
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error