Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association
141 S. Ct. 474 · Decided December 10, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association was decided on December 10, 2020 unanimously (8–0). The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2020
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 18-540
Case details
- Citations
- 141 S. Ct. 474 · 208 L. Ed. 2d 327 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 5988
- Docket number
- 18-540
- Decided
- December 10, 2020
- Argued
- October 6, 2020
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Sonia Sotomayor
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Majority | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Majority | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Did not participate: Amy Coney Barrett.
Full case caption
Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association
SCDB identifiers: case 2020-004, docket 2020-004-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”
- Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC
- Kansas v. Garcia
- Virginia Uranium v. Warren
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht
- Cantero v. Bank of America
- Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. Nevils
Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
- Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma
- Retirement Plans Committee of IBM v. Jander
- Hughes v. Northwestern University
- Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton
- Cunningham v. Cornell University
- Amgen Inc. v. Steve Harris
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error