Kansas v. Garcia
140 S. Ct. 791 · Decided March 3, 2020 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Kansas v. Garcia was decided on March 3, 2020 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation” in the Federalism area.
Read the opinion
- CourtListener (Free Law Project) — opinion text
- Supreme Court of the United States — slip opinions, October Term 2019
- Supreme Court of the United States — docket 17-834
Case details
- Citations
- 140 S. Ct. 791 · 206 L. Ed. 2d 146 · 2020 U.S. LEXIS 1511
- Docket number
- 17-834
- Decided
- March 3, 2020
- Argued
- October 16, 2019
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Samuel A. Alito Jr.
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue area
- Federalism
- Legal provision
- Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Dissent | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sonia Sotomayor | Dissent | |
| Justice Elena Kagan | Dissent | |
| Justice Neil M. Gorsuch | Concurrence | |
| Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh | Majority |
Full case caption
Kansas v. Garcia
SCDB identifiers: case 2019-009, docket 2019-009-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Federal preemption of state legislation or regulation”
- Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC
- Virginia Uranium v. Warren
- Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Association
- Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht
- Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. Nevils
- Gobeille v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Cases on the same legal provision: Immigration and Nationality statutes
- Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr
- Nasrallah v. Barr
- Nielsen v. Preap
- Pereida v. Wilkinson
- Niz-Chavez v. Garland
- Garland v. Ming Dai
Same Term, same area (Federalism)
- Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Juan v. Feliciano
- Allen v. CooperLaw held unconstitutional
- Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico v. Aurelius Investment, LLC
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error