Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico
478 U.S. 328 · Decided July 1, 1986 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico was decided on July 1, 1986 by a vote of 5–4. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 478 U.S. 328 · 106 S. Ct. 2968 · 92 L. Ed. 2d 266 · 1986 U.S. LEXIS 129
- Docket number
- 84-1903
- Decided
- July 1, 1986
- Argued
- April 28, 1986
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- William H. Rehnquist
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Commercial speech, excluding attorneys
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority |
Full case caption
Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates, Dba Condado Holiday Inn v. Tourism Company of Puerto Rico et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1985-150, docket 1985-150-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Commercial speech, excluding attorneys”
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- Board of Trustees of the State University of New York v. Fox
- Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.Law held unconstitutional
- Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoLaw held unconstitutional
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Commission of New YorkLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Cincinnati v. Discovery Network, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection)
- Davis v. Bandemer
- Attorney General of New York v. Soto-LopezLaw held unconstitutional
- Reed v. Campbell
- Wygant v. Jackson Board of Education
- Batson v. KentuckyAltered precedent
- United States v. Paradise
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission of CaliforniaLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.
- Goldman v. Weinberger
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School District
- Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error