Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
397 U.S. 137 · Decided March 2, 1970 · Supreme Court of the United States
At a glance
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc. was decided on March 2, 1970 unanimously (8–0). The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Potter Stewart wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “State or local business regulation” in the Economic Activity area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 397 U.S. 137 · 90 S. Ct. 844 · 25 L. Ed. 2d 174 · 1970 U.S. LEXIS 63
- Docket number
- 301
- Decided
- March 2, 1970
- Argued
- January 13, 1970
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–0 (unanimous)
- Majority opinion
- Potter Stewart
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- State or local business regulation
- Issue area
- Economic Activity
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Held unconstitutional
- A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Majority | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority |
Full case caption
Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.
SCDB identifiers: case 1969-052, docket 1969-052-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “State or local business regulation”
- North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.Altered precedent
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter
- City of El Paso v. Simmons
- Hudson Distributors, Inc. v. Eli Lilly & Co.
- Clay v. Sun Insurance Office, Ltd.
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., Inc. v. Cottrell
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Dunbar-Stanley Studios, Inc. v. Alabama
- Perez v. United States
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago
- Maryland v. Wirtz
- Evansville-Vanderburgh Airport Authority District v. Delta Airlines, Inc.
- Evco v. JonesLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)
- Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of California
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co., Inc.
- Zuber v. Allen
- Nacirema Operating Co., Inc. v. Johnson
- United States v. Interstate Commerce Commission
- United States v. Seckinger
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error