Maryland v. Wirtz
392 U.S. 183 · Decided June 10, 1968 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Maryland v. Wirtz was decided on June 10, 1968 by a vote of 6–2. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice John M. Harlan II wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Fair Labor Standards Act” in the Unions area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 392 U.S. 183 · 88 S. Ct. 2017 · 20 L. Ed. 2d 1020 · 1968 U.S. LEXIS 2981
- Docket number
- 742
- Decided
- June 10, 1968
- Argued
- April 23, 1968
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–2
- Majority opinion
- John M. Harlan II
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Fair Labor Standards Act
- Issue area
- Unions
- Legal provision
- Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Abe Fortas | Majority |
Did not participate: Thurgood Marshall.
Full case caption
Maryland et al. v. Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1967-162, docket 1967-162-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Fair Labor Standards Act”
- Idaho Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Wirtz
- Brennan v. Arnheim & Neely, Inc.
- Employees of the Department of Public Health and Welfare of Missouri v. Department of Public Health and Welfare of Missouri
- Falk v. Brennan
- Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.
- National League of Cities v. UseryAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Cases on the same legal provision: Article I, Section 8, Paragraph 3 (interstate commerce clause)
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago
- Dunbar-Stanley Studios, Inc. v. Alabama
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of Revenue of the State of IllinoisLaw held unconstitutional
- Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hostetter
- Perez v. United States
Same Term, same area (Unions)
- International Longshoremen's Association v. Philadelphia Marine Trade Association
- National Labor Relations Board v. Fleetwood Trailer Co., Inc.
- Wirtz v. Local 153
- Wirtz v. Local Union No. 125
- National Labor Relations Board v. United Insurance Co. of America
- American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada v. Carroll
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error