Parham v. J.R.
442 U.S. 584 · Decided June 20, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Parham v. J.R. was decided on June 20, 1979 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Juveniles” in the Civil Rights area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 442 U.S. 584 · 99 S. Ct. 2493 · 61 L. Ed. 2d 101 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 130
- Docket number
- 75-1690
- Decided
- June 20, 1979
- Argued
- December 6, 1977
- Reargued
- October 10, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Juveniles
- Issue area
- Civil Rights
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent |
Full case caption
Parham, Commissioner, Department of Human Resources of Georgia, et al. v. J.R. et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-129, docket 1978-129-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Juveniles”
- Secretary of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania v. Institutionalized Juveniles
- Swisher v. Brady
- Durst v. United States
- Ralston v. Robinson
- Santosky v. KramerLaw held unconstitutional
- Tuten v. United States
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Sandstrom v. Montana
- Mackey v. Montrym
- Barry v. BarchiLaw held unconstitutional
- Jackson v. Virginia
- Bellotti v. BairdLaw held unconstitutional
- Moore v. Duckworth
Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)
- Board of Trustees of Keene State College v. Sweeney
- Dougherty County v. White
- Holt Civic Club v. City of Tuscaloosa
- Califano v. Aznavorian
- Lalli v. Lalli
- Duren v. MissouriAltered precedentLaw held unconstitutional
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error