Mackey v. Montrym
443 U.S. 1 · Decided June 25, 1979 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Mackey v. Montrym was decided on June 25, 1979 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Chief Justice Warren E. Burger wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, hearing or notice” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 443 U.S. 1 · 99 S. Ct. 2612 · 61 L. Ed. 2d 321 · 1979 U.S. LEXIS 8
- Docket number
- 77-69
- Decided
- June 25, 1979
- Argued
- November 29, 1978
- Court era
- Burger Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–4
- Majority opinion
- Warren E. Burger
- Opinion assigned by
- Warren E. Burger
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, hearing or notice
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | |
| Justice Potter Stewart | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Warren E. Burger | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Majority | |
| Justice Lewis F. Powell Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent |
Full case caption
Mackey, Registrar of Motor Vehicles of Massachusetts v. Montrym
SCDB identifiers: case 1978-137, docket 1978-137-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, hearing or notice”
- Barry v. BarchiLaw held unconstitutional
- Leis v. Flynt
- New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co.
- O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing Center
- Board of Curators of the University of Missouri v. Horowitz
- Smith v. Organization of Foster Families for Equality & Reform
Cases on the same legal provision: Fourteenth Amendment (due process)
- Jackson v. Virginia
- Parham v. J.R.
- Secretary of Public Welfare of Pennsylvania v. Institutionalized Juveniles
- Sandstrom v. Montana
- Bellotti v. BairdLaw held unconstitutional
- Moore v. Duckworth
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- New Motor Vehicle Board of California v. Orrin W. Fox Co.
- Leis v. Flynt
- United States v. Bodcaw Co.
- Leo Sheep Co. v. United States
- Addington v. Texas
- United States v. 564.54 Acres of Land
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error