CaseTrail

Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe

331 U.S. 586 · Decided June 9, 1947 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe was decided on June 9, 1947 by a vote of 5–4. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Miscellaneous interstate conflict” in the Interstate Relations area. SCDB records that the Court declared a state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision unconstitutional.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
331 U.S. 586 · 67 S. Ct. 1355 · 91 L. Ed. 1687 · 1947 U.S. LEXIS 2161
Docket number
32
Decided
June 9, 1947
Argued
February 28, 1946
Reargued
November 12, 1946
Court era
Vinson Court
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
5–4
Majority opinion
Harold H. Burton
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)
Type of law
Constitution
Held unconstitutional
A state or territorial law, regulation or constitutional provision
Decision direction (SCDB)
Unspecifiable what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Order of United Commercial Travelers of America v. Wolfe

SCDB identifiers: case 1946-115, docket 1946-115-01.

Other cases on “Miscellaneous interstate conflict”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)

Same Term, same area (Interstate Relations)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error