May v. Anderson
345 U.S. 528 · Decided May 18, 1953 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
May v. Anderson was decided on May 18, 1953 by a vote of 5–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents” in the Due Process area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 345 U.S. 528 · 73 S. Ct. 840 · 97 L. Ed. 2d 1221 · 1953 U.S. LEXIS 2088
- Docket number
- 244
- Decided
- May 18, 1953
- Argued
- January 6, 1953
- Court era
- Vinson Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 5–3
- Majority opinion
- Harold H. Burton
- Opinion assigned by
- Fred M. Vinson
- How the case arrived
- Appeal
- Issue (SCDB)
- Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents
- Issue area
- Due Process
- Legal provision
- Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Dissent | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Robert H. Jackson | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
Did not participate: Tom C. Clark.
Full case caption
May v. Anderson
SCDB identifiers: case 1952-089, docket 1952-089-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Due process, jurisdiction over nonresidents”
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.
- Travelers Health Association v. Virginia ex Rel. State Corporation Commission
- Vanderbilt v. VanderbiltAltered precedent
- McGee v. International Life Insurance Co.
- Sherrer v. SherrerAltered precedent
- Coe v. Coe
Cases on the same legal provision: Article IV, Section 1 (full faith and credit clause)
- Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co.
- First National Bank of Chicago v. United Air Lines, Inc.Law held unconstitutional
- Sutton v. Leib
- Hughes v. FetterLaw held unconstitutional
- Carroll v. LanzaAltered precedent
- Johnson v. Muelberger
Same Term, same area (Due Process)
- United States v. Caltex (Philippines), Inc.
- United States v. CardiffLaw held unconstitutional
- City of New York v. New York
- Kwong Hai Chew v. Colding
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co. v. United States
- Shaughnessy v. United States ex Rel. Mezei
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error