Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association
493 U.S. 411 · Decided January 22, 1990 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association was decided on January 22, 1990 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice John Paul Stevens wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Protest demonstrations” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 493 U.S. 411 · 110 S. Ct. 768 · 107 L. Ed. 2d 851 · 1990 U.S. LEXIS 638
- Docket number
- 88-1198
- Decided
- January 22, 1990
- Argued
- October 30, 1989
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- John Paul Stevens
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Protest demonstrations
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- Sherman Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
Federal Trade Commission v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 1989-024, docket 1989-024-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Protest demonstrations”
- United States v. Shawn D. EichmanLaw held unconstitutional
- Texas v. JohnsonLaw held unconstitutional
- Michael Boos, J. Michael Waller and Bridget Brooker v. Marion S. Barry, Jr.Law held unconstitutional
- Rav v. City of St. PaulLaw held unconstitutional
- City of Houston v. HillLaw held unconstitutional
- United States v. Albertini
Cases on the same legal provision: Sherman Act
- Jay Palmer v. BRG of Georgia, Inc.
- City of Columbia v. Omni Outdoor Advertising, Inc.
- Summit Health, Ltd. v. Simon J. Pinhas
- Patrick v. Burget
- Business Electronics Corp. v. Sharp Electronics Corp.
- Spectrum Sports, Inc. v. Shirley McQuillan
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- University of Pennsylvania v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
- Fw/pbs, Inc. v. City of DallasLaw held unconstitutional
- Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. Board of Equalization of California
- Butterworth v. SmithLaw held unconstitutional
- Austin v. Michigan State Chamber of Commerce
- Employment Division v. Smith
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error