CaseTrail

Michele L. Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party

520 U.S. 351 · Decided April 28, 1997 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Michele L. Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New Party was decided on April 28, 1997 by a vote of 6–3. The Court reversed the lower court's decision. Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Ballot access” in the Civil Rights area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
520 U.S. 351 · 117 S. Ct. 1364 · 137 L. Ed. 2d 589 · 1997 U.S. LEXIS 2796
Docket number
95-1608
Decided
April 28, 1997
Argued
December 4, 1996
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
6–3
Majority opinion
William H. Rehnquist
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Issue (SCDB)
Ballot access
Issue area
Civil Rights
Legal provision
First Amendment (association)
Type of law
Constitutional amendment
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Michele L. Timmons, Acting Director, Ramsey County Department of Property Records and Revenue, et al. v. Twin Cities Area New Party

SCDB identifiers: case 1996-046, docket 1996-046-01.

Other cases on “Ballot access”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (association)

Same Term, same area (Civil Rights)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error