Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.
549 U.S. 118 · Decided January 9, 2007 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. was decided on January 9, 2007 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Antonin Scalia wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Standing, legal injury” in the Judicial Power area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 549 U.S. 118 · 127 S. Ct. 764 · 166 L. Ed. 2d 604 · 2007 U.S. LEXIS 1003
- Docket number
- 05-608
- Decided
- January 9, 2007
- Argued
- October 4, 2006
- Court era
- Roberts Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Reversed and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 8–1
- Majority opinion
- Antonin Scalia
- Opinion assigned by
- John G. Roberts Jr.
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Standing, legal injury
- Issue area
- Judicial Power
- Legal provision
- Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Type of law
- Constitution
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Majority | |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority | |
| Justice David H. Souter | Majority | |
| Justice Clarence Thomas | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg | Majority | |
| Justice Stephen G. Breyer | Majority | |
| Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. | Majority | |
| Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. | Majority |
Full case caption
Medimmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., et al.
SCDB identifiers: case 2006-008, docket 2006-008-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Standing, legal injury”
- Sprint Communs. Co., L.P. v. Apcc Servs.
- Esther Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.
- Wittman v. Personhuballah
- Jesner v. Arab Bank
- Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-Hill
- Nestle USA v. Doe I
Cases on the same legal provision: Article III, Section 2, Paragraph 1 (case or controversy requirement)
- Keith Lance v. Mike Coffman
- Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency
- Jay F. Hein v. Freedom From Religion Foundation, Inc.
- Daimlerchrysler Corporation v. Charlotte Cuno
- John F. Kowalski v. John C. Tesmer
- Priscilla Summers v. Earth Island Institute
Same Term, same area (Judicial Power)
- Helen Purcell v. Maria M. Gonzalez
- Reymundo Toledo-Flores v. United States
- BP America Production Company v. Rejane Burton
- Pat Osborn v. Barry Haley
- Sinochem International Co., Ltd. v. Malaysia International Shipping Corporation
- Keith Lance v. Mike Coffman
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error