CaseTrail

Mead Corp. v. Tilley

490 U.S. 714 · Decided June 5, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States

Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.

At a glance

Mead Corp. v. Tilley was decided on June 5, 1989 by a vote of 8–1. The Court reversed the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Thurgood Marshall wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Employee Retirement Income Security Act” in the Economic Activity area.

Read the opinion

Case details

Citations
490 U.S. 714 · 109 S. Ct. 2156 · 104 L. Ed. 2d 796 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 2709
Docket number
87-1868
Decided
June 5, 1989
Argued
February 22, 1989
Decision type
Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome for petitioner
The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
Vote
8–1
Majority opinion
Thurgood Marshall
Opinion assigned by
William H. Rehnquist
How the case arrived
Certiorari
Legal provision
Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)
Type of law
Federal statute
Decision direction (SCDB)
Conservative what this means

How the Justices voted

Full case caption

Mead Corp. v. Tilley et al.

SCDB identifiers: case 1988-099, docket 1988-099-01.

Other cases on “Employee Retirement Income Security Act”

See all

Cases on the same legal provision: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA)

Same Term, same area (Economic Activity)

See all

Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error