Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board
350 U.S. 270 · Decided February 27, 1956 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Mastro Plastics Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board was decided on February 27, 1956 by a vote of 6–3. The Court affirmed the lower court's decision. Justice Harold H. Burton wrote the opinion of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Labor-management no-strike clauses” in the Unions area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 350 U.S. 270 · 76 S. Ct. 349 · 100 L. Ed. 2d 309 · 1956 U.S. LEXIS 1742
- Docket number
- 19
- Decided
- February 27, 1956
- Argued
- October 17, 1955
- Court era
- Warren Court
- Decision type
- Opinion of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Affirmed
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party did not receive a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Harold H. Burton
- Opinion assigned by
- Earl Warren
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Labor-management no-strike clauses
- Issue area
- Unions
- Legal provision
- National Labor Relations Act
- Type of law
- Federal statute
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Liberal what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice Hugo L. Black | Majority | |
| Justice Stanley F. Reed | Majority | |
| Justice Felix Frankfurter | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice William O. Douglas | Majority | |
| Justice Harold H. Burton | Majority | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Tom C. Clark | Majority | |
| Justice Sherman Minton | Dissent | |
| Chief Justice Earl Warren | Majority | |
| Justice John M. Harlan II | Dissent |
Full case caption
Mastro Plastics Corp. et al. v. National Labor Relations Board
SCDB identifiers: case 1955-026, docket 1955-026-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Labor-management no-strike clauses”
- Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago River & Indiana Railroad Co.
- Local 174 v. Lucas Flour Co.
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.
- Gateway Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America
- Carbon Fuel Co. v. United Mine Workers of America
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Reis
Cases on the same legal provision: National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cocacola Bottling Co. of Louisville, Inc.
- United Mine Workers of America v. Arkansas Oak Flooring Co.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Warren Company, Inc.
- United Automobile v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board
Same Term, same area (Unions)
- Mitchell v. Myrtle Grove Packing Co.
- Steiner v. Mitchell
- Mitchell v. King Packing Co.
- National Labor Relations Board v. Cocacola Bottling Co. of Louisville, Inc.
- United States v. Ryan
- Mitchell v. Budd
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error