Massachusetts v. Oakes
491 U.S. 576 · Decided June 21, 1989 · Supreme Court of the United States
Record summary. This page is generated from the Supreme Court Database’s coded data about the case. It describes who decided what, not the Court’s reasoning. Read the opinion itself before relying on it. Not legal advice.
At a glance
Massachusetts v. Oakes was decided on June 21, 1989 by a vote of 6–3. The Court vacated the lower court's decision and remanded the case. Justice Sandra Day O'Connor wrote the opinion announcing the judgment of the Court. SCDB classifies its main issue as “Obscenity, state” in the First Amendment area.
Read the opinion
Case details
- Citations
- 491 U.S. 576 · 109 S. Ct. 2633 · 105 L. Ed. 2d 493 · 1989 U.S. LEXIS 3116
- Docket number
- 87-1651
- Decided
- June 21, 1989
- Argued
- January 17, 1989
- Court era
- Rehnquist Court
- Decision type
- Judgment of the Court (orally argued)
- Disposition
- Vacated and remanded
- Outcome for petitioner
- The petitioning party received a favorable disposition
- Vote
- 6–3
- Majority opinion
- Sandra Day O'Connor
- Opinion assigned by
- William H. Rehnquist
- How the case arrived
- Certiorari
- Issue (SCDB)
- Obscenity, state
- Issue area
- First Amendment
- Legal provision
- First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Type of law
- Constitutional amendment
- Decision direction (SCDB)
- Conservative what this means
How the Justices voted
| Justice | Vote | Separate writing |
|---|---|---|
| Justice William J. Brennan Jr. | Dissent | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Byron R. White | Majority | |
| Justice Thurgood Marshall | Dissent | |
| Justice Harry A. Blackmun | Special concurrence | |
| Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist | Majority | |
| Justice John Paul Stevens | Dissent | |
| Justice Sandra Day O'Connor | Judgment of the Court | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Antonin Scalia | Special concurrence | Wrote an opinion |
| Justice Anthony M. Kennedy | Majority |
Full case caption
Massachusetts v. Oakes
SCDB identifiers: case 1988-129, docket 1988-129-01.
Related decisions
Other cases on “Obscenity, state”
- Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana
- Osborne v. Ohio
- Michael Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc.
- Pope v. Illinois
- City of Newport v. Iacobucci
- New York v. P.J. Video, Inc.
Cases on the same legal provision: First Amendment (speech, press, and assembly)
- Texas v. JohnsonLaw held unconstitutional
- The Florida Star v. B. J. F.Law held unconstitutional
- Ward v. Rock Against Racism
- Board of Trustees of the State University of New York v. Fox
- Thornburgh v. AbbottAltered precedent
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeLaw held unconstitutional
Same Term, same area (First Amendment)
- Carlucci v. Doe
- Texas Monthly, Inc. v. BullockLaw held unconstitutional
- Fort Wayne Books, Inc. v. Indiana
- Eu v. San Francisco County Democratic Central CommitteeLaw held unconstitutional
- Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security
- City of Dallas v. Stanglin
Source: Supreme Court Database, 2026 Release 01 (data file dated September 8, 2026). Imported into CaseTrail November 5, 2026. Coverage: decisions from the 1946 through 2025 Terms. Methodology · Report an error